The Gambia’s TRRC seems to be turning into a conflicted Commission because the Executive seems totally determined to continue to display total disregard to even the problematicTRRC Act, 2017 they constructed.
We are gradually witnessing the composition of a TRRC that may earn it the most conflicted truth commission. Some of the readers may be aware of the following pieces:
Here is how the journey of the (seemingly conflicted) TRRC started:
Going forward, it may be helpful for the Secretariat to find creative ways to quickly establish a website dedicated to the TRRC, which may send a positive signal to the donors in regards to our priories and image.
It will allow the rest of the world, especially those who are not Facebook and Twitter users, to know what is going on with The Gambia’s TRRC as well as lessen the personalisation of the TRRC and its consequent deepening of the conflict of interest that has already surrounded the Commission.
There is an expectation (at least from fair-minded citizens, bilateral partners, AU, UN, and donors), because it is at least implied, if not very explicit in the TRRC Act, 2017 that the post of Chairperson, Deputy Chairperson (-indeed all Commissioners) of the Commission must go to individuals with no discernible conflicts of interests [TRRC Act, 2017; section 17(1-4)] as well as those who fulfil the criteria in section 5(3) of the TRRC Act, 2017.
At the very least, the criteria the Commissioners and members of the TRRC must fulfil (and it is against these measures, i.e., the Executive’s own rules that much is being written about) are essentially the 2 sections of the TRRC Act, 2017 which are as follows:
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Commissioner if he or she –
On August 20/21, 2018, we received the announcement of the 11 names intended to be appointed by the President as Commissioners of the TRRC. Please find below the names of the 11 Commissioners the President intends to appoint:
It was very refreshing for the Executive to invite the public (the Gambians– in the country and abroad) to submit objections to the names. But this welcome announcement has been dampened by the fact that they only gave us 10 days to send the objections by no other means, but surface mail or on foot to the Justice Ministry, Marina Parade, Banjul.
In fact, given this very tight deadline, one would have thought that the Executive would have facilitated the process for the public to submit their objections.
The fact that there has been no or little known public sensitisation, and advocacy on the matter and no alternative methods were issued to enable citizens in the rural Gambia and the diaspora to send in their objections to the Commissioners intended to be appointed by the President seems irresponsible.
Besides, they have not told us what they intend to do with the objections they receive and how many (valid) objections it would take to trigger a rethink of any appointment. Indeed, it is not known how many of us have seen, read and understood the TRRC Act, 2017 to allow us to object to any of the nominated Commissioners, should we need to. To ensure that we all have access to the(problematic) TRRC Act, 2017, please click here.
Now, a bit of search on the intended Chairperson of the TRRC, Mr. Abdoulie Janneh, revealed some of what theExecutive shared with us about him. In regards to his current assignment, here is what can be found on the Mo Ibrahim Foundation’s website, and you can click here or read the text below:
“Abdoulie Janneh is Executive Director, Liaison with Governments and Institutions in Africa for the Mo Ibrahim Foundation; the former UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), prior to which he was UNDP Regional Director for Africa. Mr Janneh is a strong advocate for aligning development efforts to Africa’s priorities.
Mr Janneh remains engaged in supporting the African Union vision, NEPAD, the African Peer Review Mechanism and the climate change agenda.
He is chair of the African Governance Institute and serves on the Boards the Coalition for Dialogue on Africa (CoDA), PaxAfricana and Africa Forum amongst others.”
Further searches show that Mr. Janneh seems to be a very, very busy man, but I am sure he has given this challenging assignment much thought. I think that Mr. Janneh’s wisdom, leadership, extensive experience in the MIF, and previous track record in UN and especially his contacts within it and elsewhere would be invaluable to the TRRC.
In regards to Ms. Adelaide Sosseh Gaye, Mr. Janneh’s intended Deputy, many would know that she has been a vocal critic of Dictator Jammeh.
Similarly, her daughter, Ms. Ndey TaphaSosseh has been a solid critic of Jammeh’s cruel government, especially after the brutal killing– on December 16, 2004 of her dear colleague, our veteran journalist Mr. Deyda Hydara, of blessed memory. Furthermore, some of us would know that until recently, Ms. Ndey Tapa Sosseh was living in exile since about2009. We may also be able to say with some certainty that Ms.Adelaide Sosseh Gaye is a UDP supporter. If this can be confirmed, it makes her unsuitable for appointment as a Commissioner of the TRRC under the TRRC Act, 2017; 5(3)(a).
Notwithstanding, Ms. Adelaide Sosseh Gaye seems sufficiently conflicted and therefore unsuitable for appointment, especially as Deputy Chairperson of the TRRC.
With 6 days remaining, the search intensifies (for me at least) on the remaining 9 intended Commissioners. Using the Executive’s own rules as outlined in the above sections of the TRRC Act, 2017, it remains unclear if all of the intended Commissioners can safely sail through without objections to their appointment as Commissioners of The Gambia’s TRRC. Overall, 10 days seems too short for the public, especially for most the affected victims in the country and abroad to send in their objections, by surface mail or on foot, in a timely manner.
What may be certain at this stage, which may be the Executive’s design, is that the Executive’s actions may give them the outcome they want, but it may be an outcome that is prejudiced.
Therefore, their actions further raise doubts about the TRRC as regards to its impartiality, fairness, legitimacy, credibility and above all its desire to deliver reconciliation and justice for some of those most affected by Jammeh’s brutal regime. In brief, any commission that fails to take conflict of interest seriously, with the Executive displaying tendencies for partiality, flawed or incompetent practices that commission is likely to fail.
Thanks, it’s quite informative
I thank Dr Janneh for the latest update on this contentious matter of national importance.
Having said that, however, I am of the view that he and like-minded defenders of the rule of law and due process in The Gambia should perhaps pool their resources together and have recourse to the law courts, with a view to obtaining some mandatory injunction against an executive that seems not to care that it in fact is in breach of both the Constitution and the TRRC ACT. The former’s requirements as to fair trial have not been met as far as the TRRC is concerned – and as of now, there is ample evidence that the later’s decisions shall be biased against the those summoned before it.
Indeed, the conflict of interest matter not to mention other blatant breaches of the law in this regard must be addressed forthwith. If not, the whole process shall end up in failure after wasting millions of dollars in the project. Should we allow our TRRC project to be laughing stock of the whole world?