A good investigatory panel is distinguished by impartiality, thoroughness, and expertise. It should comprise individuals who are objective, unbiased, and able to maintain confidentiality. Effective panels also conduct thorough investigations, gathering and analyzing evidence, and utilizing clear and transparent communication.
Therefore, this so-called National Assembly select committee, otherwise a parliamentary inquiry, must investigate how the assets were sold, the price at which they were sold, who bought the looted assets of dictator Yahya Jammeh, and whether the process was conducted correctly and fairly according to the criteria of a good investigatory panel. These key concerns and components are very imperative to an inquiry:
1. Impartiality and Objectivity:
No conflicts of interest: Panel members should not have personal or professional relationships with individuals involved in the investigation, nor should they have a vested interest in the outcome.
Neutral perspective:
They should approach the investigation with an open mind, avoiding preconceived notions or biases.
Professional demeanor:
Panel members should maintain a professional and respectful demeanor throughout the investigation, regardless of the emotions involved.
2. Expertise and Competence:
Relevant knowledge and skills:
Panel members should possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and experience to conduct the investigation effectively. This may include legal, regulatory, or technical expertise depending on the nature of the investigation.
Interviewing skills:
They should be adept at conducting interviews, gathering information, and analyzing evidence.
Analytical and problem-solving skills:
Panel members should be able to critically analyze information, identify patterns, and draw logical conclusions.
3. Thoroughness and Accuracy:
Comprehensive investigation:
The panel should conduct a thorough investigation, ensuring all relevant information is gathered and analyzed.
Accurate record-keeping:
Detailed records should be kept of all interviews, evidence collected, and findings.
Clear and transparent communication:
The panel should communicate its findings and recommendations clearly and transparently, ensuring all parties understand the process and results.
4. Adherence to Policies and Procedures:
Following established protocols:
The panel should adhere to established policies and procedures for conducting investigations, ensuring fairness and consistency.
Maintaining confidentiality:
Confidentiality should be maintained throughout the investigation, protecting the privacy of individuals involved.
Adhering to legal and ethical standards:
The panel should be aware of and adhere to all applicable legal, regulatory, and ethical standards.
If the panel satisfies all the above criteria in its composition, then the outcome of such an inquiry may yield a more credible result than having one that is fully compromised.
The Jammeh Commission has conducted a thorough investigation into the misappropriation of assets by Yahya Jammeh and identified his assets, submitting a report to the president that generated cabinet papers or white papers. Therefore, the president can not claim unawareness of the sale of Jammeh’s looted assets at significantly reduced prices among themselves, their families, and associates.
The reconstitution of another commission of inquiry to investigate the modalities of the undervaluation of these assets is unnecessary, as receipts for every transaction are already available. Consequently, this entire process is a misallocation of taxpayers’ resources and perpetuates a culture of impunity.
